🔗 Share this article Russia Seeks Significant Sum in Damages from Euroclear Regarding Frozen Funds Russia's monetary authority has declared it is claiming compensation valued at $230 billion against the securities depository Euroclear. This move represents a clear response from the Kremlin regarding proposals to utilize frozen Russian state assets to support Ukraine. The Substantial Demand Based on accounts in local state media, the central bank filed a claim last week for an estimated 18 trillion roubles. This sum is equivalent to the stated $230 billion claim. EU leaders will determine in the coming days regarding a proposal to leverage around €210 billion in immobilized Russian state funds. The proposal involves providing Ukraine with a large loan to fund its defence and economic needs. Most of these funds, totaling €185 billion, are held at the Euroclear depository in Brussels. This institution acts as the main keeper for the Russian immobilised sovereign wealth. Divergent Legal Views European Union authorities have maintained that their proposal is on solid legal ground. Their position is based on the fact that title of the sovereign wealth still belongs to Russia, despite being it was frozen in EU jurisdictions following the 2022 military offensive of Ukraine. The Russian government, however, has called any utilization of the assets as theft. It has threatened retaliatory actions, including seizing EU corporate holdings within Russia. The head of Russia's sovereign wealth fund, a figure who has taken on a key role in diplomatic talks, stated on a social media platform that Russia "will win in court" and regain its funds. He added that the EU, the common currency, and Euroclear "will face consequences" from the proposal. Geopolitical Maneuvering With statements seen as an attempt to create division between Europe and the United States, Dmitriev described the assets plan as "a severe assault on the right to ownership and the global financial system established by the United States." Euroclear declined to provide a statement on the new lawsuit. The institution has in the past noted it is facing more than 100 lawsuits in Russian courts. Legal Hurdles Ahead Although judges in EU countries are not expected to enforce rulings from Russian courts, analysts anticipate Moscow to seek enforcement in nations with closer ties to the Kremlin. "Russian monetary authorities may attempt to implement a Russian court's decision against Euroclear in countries such as China, Hong Kong, the UAE, Kazakhstan, and other sympathetic states, if such assets can be located," commented a legal expert from an international firm. EU Countermeasures European authorities said they are working on measures to deter other nations from aiding any Russian legal action against European companies. Additionally, they are crafting safeguards to shield EU countries with assets in Russia from what they call "unlawful expropriation." How the Funding Would Work Under the complex scheme, the EU would provide an initial €90 billion loan to Ukraine, backed by the cash generated from the immobilized assets at Euroclear. Critically, Russia's ownership claim on the principal funds would remain untouched. Ukraine would solely be required to return the money if and when Russia consented to pay compensation for the vast destruction caused during the nearly four-year war. Other Funding Ideas Belgium, backed by Italy, Bulgaria, and Malta, has urged the EU to examine an alternative approach for financing Ukraine. This entails common EU borrowing to secure a loan, using unallocated funds within the European budget. This alternative move, however, demands unanimity among all 27 EU countries. Hungary's government, considered friendly with the Kremlin, has already expressed its objection. Speaking on Monday, the EU foreign policy chief, Kaja Kallas, described the proposed loan scheme as "the most credible option" for supporting Ukraine. "The reparations loan is secured against the Russian immobilized funds, meaning it is not drawn from our taxpayers' money, which is also significant," she remarked. "Furthermore, it delivers a clear signal that if you cause all this destruction to another nation, you have to pay for the rebuilding."